Re: 1,5 TB partition: use cbc-essiv or xts-plain?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: 1,5 TB partition: use cbc-essiv or xts-plain?
From: Heinz Diehl <htd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:37:15 +0200
In-reply-to: <20090803173420.GC21647@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
Organization: private site
References: <20090803125342.CF87216440B5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090803143456.GA17977@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <of8my6gub2u.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090803173420.GC21647@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: dm-crypt-bounces@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20+20090706 (GNU/Linux 2.6.30.4 x86_64)

On 03.08.2009, Heinz Diehl wrote: 

> The weakness is not related to the algorithm itself, but to the IV generator.

s/IV generator/mode of operation

Sorry!
_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt

References:
- 1,5 TB partition: use cbc-essiv or xts-plain?
  - From: Henrik Theiling
- Re: 1,5 TB partition: use cbc-essiv or xts-plain?
  - From: Heinz Diehl
- Re: 1,5 TB partition: use cbc-essiv or xts-plain?
  - From: Henrik Theiling
- Re: 1,5 TB partition: use cbc-essiv or xts-plain?
  - From: Heinz Diehl

Prev by Date: Re: 1,5 TB partition: use cbc-essiv or xts-plain?
Next by Date: Re: 1,5 TB partition: use cbc-essiv or xts-plain?
Previous by thread: Re: 1,5 TB partition: use cbc-essiv or xts-plain?
Next by thread: Re: 1,5 TB partition: use cbc-essiv or xts-plain?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Device Mapper Devel] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux