Jonas Meurer wrote: > On 22/07/2009 Jonas Meurer wrote: > i now sorted the keyfiles in order of their size in the keyslots, and > discovered that the time luksOpen takes seems to depend highly on the > used keyslot, rather than on the keyfile size: yes, that's known problem with sequential scan of keyslots I described and I already indicated what is the possible solution. The time which open takes should be independent of slot # and also should not depend if the attempt to open any keyslot was successful or not. (But the information which keylot is active is known from header.) Milan --------------------------------------------------------------------- dm-crypt mailing list - http://www.saout.de/misc/dm-crypt/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: dm-crypt-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: dm-crypt-help@xxxxxxxx
