Arno wrote:
> However I would feel not to good about the "rm". Would
> it not be better to check the output of "mount"?
Ok, I hear you and I'm thinking better safe than sorry. Heres a revision that
shuts down on any failure and tries to take care of memory using secure-delete's
smem.
cd /dev/mapper
fuser -km crypt-foo
err=0
if ! umount crypt-foo crypt-swap; then
err=1
umount -l crypt-foo; fi
if ! cryptsetup luksClose crypt-foo; then
err=1
rm -f crypt-foo; fi
if ! swapoff -a && cryptsetup remove crypt-swap; then
err=1
rm -f crypt-swap; fi
smem
((err)) && halt
- Drew
---------------------------------------------------------------------
dm-crypt mailing list - http://www.saout.de/misc/dm-crypt/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dm-crypt-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: dm-crypt-help@xxxxxxxx
