On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 09:31:15AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Masahiro Yamada > <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 2015-10-26 17:17 GMT+09:00 Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>: > >>> This series adds two I2C controller drivers. > >>> (they are completely different IPs.) > >>> > >>> The first one is a very simple FIFO-less I2C controller, > >>> which is used on some older UniPhier SoCs. > >>> > >>> The other one is higher-performance I2C controller with TX/RX FIFO, > >>> used on newer UniPhier SoCs. > >> > >> And you have sent this to me because ... ? > > > > > > No special reason. > > > > > > I sent this series to linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. > > > > I guess you were automatically CC'ed by scripts/get_maintainer.pl. > > > > Using get_maintainer.pl is a normal process when sending patches, I think. > > Please use common sense. It doesn't make much sense to CC everybody who > ever made a minor edit to an affected file. > > If checkpatch comes up with more than 5 names, this should ring a bell. I usually use get_maintainer.pl with --no-git-fallback to catch people listed in MAINTAINERS only. But mileages vary a lot in that area.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
