Does dt property name in a binding always need a vendor prefix?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Experts,

I am looking for guidelines to name a DT property in a bindings. Do we need to add a vendor specific prefix always or is it needed only specific cases? I know the intent here is to avoid name space collision. But by name space I assume, within a specific a device binding. For example where device driver has a core framework that also uses DT properties, any low level device driver using the framework needs to add a vendor specific prefix to avoid collision. Is my understanding correct? So standalone device drivers doesn't have to use prefix? Right?

--
Murali Karicheri
Linux Kernel, Keystone
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux