On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm away for the rest of this week and don't have the time to give this
> a full review, but I've given this a first pass and have some high-level
> comments:
>
> First, most of this is copy+paste from x86. We should try to share code
> rather than duplicating it. Especially as it looks like there's cleanup
> (and therefore divergence) that could happen.
this is arch specific glue layer for numa.
there might be some common functions and there will be arch specific
hacks/exceptions.
if we try to pull out common code then still will have some arch
specific code or end up with unavoidable ifdefs.
IMHO, this code better to be in arch (in single file).
>
> Second, this reimplements memblock to associate nids with memory
> regions. I think we should keep memblock around for this (I'm under the
> impression that Ard also wants that for memory attributes), rather than
> creating a new memblock-like API that we then have to reconcile with
> actual memblock information.
thanks, this seems to be good idea to reuse the memblock code/infrastructures.
will work on this.
>
> Third, NAK to the changes to /proc/cpuinfo, please drop that from the
> patch. Further comments on that matter are inline below.
ok.
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 04:15:28PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>> Adding numa support for arm64 based platforms.
>> This patch adds by default the dummy numa node and
>> maps all memory and cpus to node 0.
>> using this patch, numa can be simulated on single node arm64 platforms.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 25 ++
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h | 17 ++
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h | 63 +++++
>> arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 9 +
>> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 2 +
>> arch/arm64/mm/Makefile | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 31 ++-
>> arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 531 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 8 files changed, 675 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> index 7d95663..0f9cdc7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ config ARM64
>> select HAVE_GENERIC_DMA_COHERENT
>> select HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT if PERF_EVENTS
>> select HAVE_MEMBLOCK
>> + select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP if NUMA
>> select HAVE_PATA_PLATFORM
>> select HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
>> select HAVE_PERF_REGS
>> @@ -414,6 +415,30 @@ config HOTPLUG_CPU
>> Say Y here to experiment with turning CPUs off and on. CPUs
>> can be controlled through /sys/devices/system/cpu.
>>
>> +# Common NUMA Features
>> +config NUMA
>> + bool "Numa Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support"
>> + depends on SMP
>> + help
>> + Enable NUMA (Non Uniform Memory Access) support.
>> +
>> + The kernel will try to allocate memory used by a CPU on the
>> + local memory controller of the CPU and add some more
>> + NUMA awareness to the kernel.
>> +
>> +config NODES_SHIFT
>> + int "Maximum NUMA Nodes (as a power of 2)"
>> + range 1 10
>> + default "2"
>> + depends on NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
>> + help
>> + Specify the maximum number of NUMA Nodes available on the target
>> + system. Increases memory reserved to accommodate various tables.
>
> How much memory do we end up requiring per node?
not much. however it is proportional to number of max nodes supported
by the system.
>
>> +
>> +config USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID
>> + def_bool y
>> + depends on NUMA
>> +
>> source kernel/Kconfig.preempt
>>
>> config HZ
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..6ddd468
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
>> +#ifndef __ASM_ARM64_MMZONE_H_
>> +#define __ASM_ARM64_MMZONE_H_
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
>> +
>> +#include <linux/mmdebug.h>
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +
>> +#include <asm/smp.h>
>> +#include <asm/numa.h>
>> +
>> +extern struct pglist_data *node_data[];
>> +
>> +#define NODE_DATA(nid) (node_data[(nid)])
>> +
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
>> +#endif /* __ASM_ARM64_MMZONE_H_ */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..cadbd24
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
>> +#ifndef _ASM_NUMA_H
>> +#define _ASM_NUMA_H
>> +
>> +#include <linux/nodemask.h>
>> +#include <asm/topology.h>
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
>> +
>> +#define NR_NODE_MEMBLKS (MAX_NUMNODES * 2)
>> +#define ZONE_ALIGN (1UL << (MAX_ORDER + PAGE_SHIFT))
>> +
>> +/* currently, arm64 implements flat NUMA topology */
>> +#define parent_node(node) (node)
>> +
>> +extern int __node_distance(int from, int to);
>> +#define node_distance(a, b) __node_distance(a, b)
>> +
>> +/* dummy definitions for pci functions */
>> +#define pcibus_to_node(node) 0
>> +#define cpumask_of_pcibus(bus) 0
>> +
>> +struct __node_cpu_hwid {
>> + int node_id; /* logical node containing this CPU */
>> + u64 cpu_hwid; /* MPIDR for this CPU */
>> +};
>
> We already have the MPIDR ID in the cpu_logical_map. Please don't
> duplicate it here.
>
> As node_cpu_hwid seems to be indexed by logical ID, you can simlpy use
> the same index for the logical map to get the MPIDR ID when necessary.
thanks, this solves what we wanted to achieve with this mapping.
>
>> +
>> +struct numa_memblk {
>> + u64 start;
>> + u64 end;
>> + int nid;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct numa_meminfo {
>> + int nr_blks;
>> + struct numa_memblk blk[NR_NODE_MEMBLKS];
>> +};
>
> I think we should keep the usual memblock around for this. It already
> has some nid support.
ok.
>
>> +
>> +extern struct __node_cpu_hwid node_cpu_hwid[NR_CPUS];
>> +extern nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
>> +
>> +/* Mappings between node number and cpus on that node. */
>> +extern cpumask_var_t node_to_cpumask_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
>> +extern void numa_clear_node(unsigned int cpu);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS
>> +extern const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node);
>> +#else
>> +/* Returns a pointer to the cpumask of CPUs on Node 'node'. */
>> +static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
>> +{
>> + return node_to_cpumask_map[node];
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
>> +int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
>> +void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
>> +void __init numa_reset_distance(void);
>> +void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu);
>> +#else /* CONFIG_NUMA */
>> +static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
>> +static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
>> +#endif /* _ASM_NUMA_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
>> index a2794da..4f3623d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
>> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
>> #include <asm/elf.h>
>> #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
>> #include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
>> +#include <asm/numa.h>
>> #include <asm/sections.h>
>> #include <asm/setup.h>
>> #include <asm/smp_plat.h>
>> @@ -485,6 +486,9 @@ static int __init topology_init(void)
>> {
>> int i;
>>
>> + for_each_online_node(i)
>> + register_one_node(i);
>> +
>> for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
>> struct cpu *cpu = &per_cpu(cpu_data.cpu, i);
>> cpu->hotpluggable = 1;
>> @@ -557,7 +561,12 @@ static int c_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>> * online processors, looking for lines beginning with
>> * "processor". Give glibc what it expects.
>> */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
>> + seq_printf(m, "processor\t: %d", i);
>> + seq_printf(m, " [nid: %d]\n", cpu_to_node(i));
>> +#else
>> seq_printf(m, "processor\t: %d\n", i);
>> +#endif
>
> As above, NAK to a /proc/cpuinfo change.
>
> We don't have this on arch/arm and didn't previously have it on arm64,
> so it could easily break existing software (both compat and native).
> Having the format randomly change based on a config option is also not
> great, and there's already been enough pain in this area.
>
> Additionally, other architctures don't have this, so it's clearly not
> necessary.
ok, will remove this.
>
> Surely there's a (portable/consistent) sysfs interface that provides the
> NUMA information userspace requires? If not, we should add one that
> works across architectures.
>
>>
>> /*
>> * Dump out the common processor features in a single line.
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
>> index dbdaacd..985ee04 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
>> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
>> #include <asm/cputype.h>
>> #include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
>> #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
>> +#include <asm/numa.h>
>> #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>> #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
>> #include <asm/processor.h>
>> @@ -125,6 +126,7 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
>> static void smp_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpuid)
>> {
>> store_cpu_topology(cpuid);
>> + numa_store_cpu_info(cpuid);
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
>> index 773d37a..bb92d41 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
>> @@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ obj-y := dma-mapping.o extable.o fault.o init.o \
>> context.o proc.o pageattr.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE) += hugetlbpage.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_PTDUMP) += dump.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_NUMA) += numa.o
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
>> index 697a6d0..81a0316 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
>> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
>>
>> #include <asm/fixmap.h>
>> #include <asm/memory.h>
>> +#include <asm/numa.h>
>> #include <asm/sections.h>
>> #include <asm/setup.h>
>> #include <asm/sizes.h>
>> @@ -77,6 +78,20 @@ static phys_addr_t max_zone_dma_phys(void)
>> return min(offset + (1ULL << 32), memblock_end_of_DRAM());
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
>> +static void __init zone_sizes_init(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long max_zone_pfns[MAX_NR_ZONES];
>> +
>> + memset(max_zone_pfns, 0, sizeof(max_zone_pfns));
>
> You can make this simpler by initialising the variable when defining it:
>
> unsigned long max_zone_pfs[MAX_NR_ZONES] = { 0 };
ok
>
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA))
>> + max_zone_pfns[ZONE_DMA] = PFN_DOWN(max_zone_dma_phys());
>> + max_zone_pfns[ZONE_NORMAL] = max;
>> +
>> + free_area_init_nodes(max_zone_pfns);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#else
>> static void __init zone_sizes_init(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
>> {
>> struct memblock_region *reg;
>> @@ -115,6 +130,7 @@ static void __init zone_sizes_init(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
>>
>> free_area_init_node(0, zone_size, min, zhole_size);
>> }
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID
>> int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
>> @@ -132,10 +148,15 @@ static void arm64_memory_present(void)
>> static void arm64_memory_present(void)
>> {
>> struct memblock_region *reg;
>> + int nid = 0;
>>
>> - for_each_memblock(memory, reg)
>> - memory_present(0, memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(reg),
>> - memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(reg));
>> + for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
>> + nid = reg->nid;
>> +#endif
>> + memory_present(nid, memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(reg),
>> + memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(reg));
>> + }
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> @@ -192,6 +213,9 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
>>
>> early_memtest(min << PAGE_SHIFT, max << PAGE_SHIFT);
>>
>> + max_pfn = max_low_pfn = max;
>> +
>> + arm64_numa_init();
>> /*
>> * Sparsemem tries to allocate bootmem in memory_present(), so must be
>> * done after the fixed reservations.
>> @@ -202,7 +226,6 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
>> zone_sizes_init(min, max);
>>
>> high_memory = __va((max << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1) + 1;
>> - max_pfn = max_low_pfn = max;
>> }
>>
>> #ifndef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..4dd7436
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,531 @@
>> +/*
>> + * NUMA support, based on the x86 implementation.
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2015 Cavium Inc.
>> + * Author: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + *
>> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> + * along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/mm.h>
>> +#include <linux/string.h>
>> +#include <linux/init.h>
>> +#include <linux/bootmem.h>
>> +#include <linux/memblock.h>
>> +#include <linux/ctype.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/nodemask.h>
>> +#include <linux/sched.h>
>> +#include <linux/topology.h>
>> +#include <linux/mmzone.h>
>
> Nit: please sort these alphabetically.
ok
>
>> +
>> +#include <asm/smp_plat.h>
>> +
>> +struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly;
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(node_data);
>> +nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
>> +struct __node_cpu_hwid node_cpu_hwid[NR_CPUS];
>> +
>> +static int numa_off;
>> +static int numa_distance_cnt;
>> +static u8 *numa_distance;
>> +static struct numa_meminfo numa_meminfo;
>> +
>> +static __init int numa_parse_early_param(char *opt)
>> +{
>> + if (!opt)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + if (!strncmp(opt, "off", 3)) {
>> + pr_info("%s\n", "NUMA turned off");
>> + numa_off = 1;
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +early_param("numa", numa_parse_early_param);
>> +
>> +cpumask_var_t node_to_cpumask_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(node_to_cpumask_map);
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS
>> +/*
>> + * Returns a pointer to the bitmask of CPUs on Node 'node'.
>> + */
>> +const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
>> +{
>> + if (node >= nr_node_ids) {
>> + pr_warn("cpumask_of_node(%d): node > nr_node_ids(%d)\n",
>> + node, nr_node_ids);
>> + dump_stack();
>> + return cpu_none_mask;
>> + }
>
> This can be:
>
> if (WARN_ON(node >= nr_node_ids))
> return cpu_none_mask;
>
ok
>> + if (node_to_cpumask_map[node] == NULL) {
>> + pr_warn("cpumask_of_node(%d): no node_to_cpumask_map!\n",
>> + node);
>> + dump_stack();
>> + return cpu_online_mask;
>> + }
>
> Likewise:
>
> if (WARN_ON(!node_to_cpumask_map[node]))
> return cpu_online_mask;
ok.
>
>> + return node_to_cpumask_map[node];
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpumask_of_node);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +static void map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid)
>> +{
>> + set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, nid);
>> + if (nid >= 0)
>> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, node_to_cpumask_map[nid]);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void unmap_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu)
>> +{
>> + int nid = cpu_to_node(cpu);
>> +
>> + if (nid >= 0)
>> + cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, node_to_cpumask_map[nid]);
>> + set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, NUMA_NO_NODE);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void numa_clear_node(unsigned int cpu)
>> +{
>> + unmap_cpu_to_node(cpu);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Allocate node_to_cpumask_map based on number of available nodes
>> + * Requires node_possible_map to be valid.
>> + *
>> + * Note: cpumask_of_node() is not valid until after this is done.
>> + * (Use CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS to check this.)
>> + */
>> +static void __init setup_node_to_cpumask_map(void)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int cpu;
>> + int node;
>> +
>> + /* setup nr_node_ids if not done yet */
>> + if (nr_node_ids == MAX_NUMNODES)
>> + setup_nr_node_ids();
>
> Where would this be done otherwise?
in function free_area_init_nodes
>
> If we can initialise this earlier, what happens if we actually had
> MAX_NUMNODES nodes?
init of table for actual number of nodes, this is just to avoid
uncesary table allocation.
>
>> +
>> + /* allocate the map */
>> + for (node = 0; node < nr_node_ids; node++)
>> + alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&node_to_cpumask_map[node]);
>> +
>> + /* Clear the mapping */
>> + for (node = 0; node < nr_node_ids; node++)
>> + cpumask_clear(node_to_cpumask_map[node]);
>
> Why not do these at the same time?
ok, can be done.
>
> Can an allocation fail?
most unlikely, however will add check.
>
>> +
>> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
>> + set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, NUMA_NO_NODE);
>> +
>> + /* cpumask_of_node() will now work */
>> + pr_debug("Node to cpumask map for %d nodes\n", nr_node_ids);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Set the cpu to node and mem mapping
>> + */
>> +void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu)
>> +{
>> + map_cpu_to_node(cpu, numa_off ? 0 : node_cpu_hwid[cpu].node_id);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * numa_add_memblk_to - Add one numa_memblk to a numa_meminfo
>> + */
>> +
>> +static int __init numa_add_memblk_to(int nid, u64 start, u64 end,
>> + struct numa_meminfo *mi)
>> +{
>> + /* ignore zero length blks */
>> + if (start == end)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + /* whine about and ignore invalid blks */
>> + if (start > end || nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
>> + pr_warn("NUMA: Warning: invalid memblk node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
>> + nid, start, end - 1);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>
> When would this happen?
if acpi or dt binding is wrong/corrupt.
>
>> +
>> + if (mi->nr_blks >= NR_NODE_MEMBLKS) {
>> + pr_err("NUMA: too many memblk ranges\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + pr_info("NUMA: Adding memblock %d [0x%llx - 0x%llx] on node %d\n",
>> + mi->nr_blks, start, end, nid);
>> + mi->blk[mi->nr_blks].start = start;
>> + mi->blk[mi->nr_blks].end = end;
>> + mi->blk[mi->nr_blks].nid = nid;
>> + mi->nr_blks++;
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> As I mentioned earlier, I think that we should keep the memblock
> infrastructure around, and reuse it here.
will try as said in the beginning.
>
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * numa_add_memblk - Add one numa_memblk to numa_meminfo
>> + * @nid: NUMA node ID of the new memblk
>> + * @start: Start address of the new memblk
>> + * @end: End address of the new memblk
>> + *
>> + * Add a new memblk to the default numa_meminfo.
>> + *
>> + * RETURNS:
>> + * 0 on success, -errno on failure.
>> + */
>> +#define MAX_PHYS_ADDR ((phys_addr_t)~0)
>
> We should probably rethink MAX_MEMBLOCK_ADDR and potentially make it
> more generic so we can use it here and elsewhere. See commit
> 8eafeb4802281651 ("of/fdt: make memblock maximum physical address arch
> configurable").
>
> However, that might not matter if we're able to reuse memblock.
ok
>
>> +
>> +int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 base, u64 end)
>> +{
>> + const u64 phys_offset = __pa(PAGE_OFFSET);
>> +
>> + base &= PAGE_MASK;
>> + end &= PAGE_MASK;
>> +
>> + if (base > MAX_PHYS_ADDR) {
>> + pr_warn("NUMA: Ignoring memory block 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
>> + base, base + end);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (base + end > MAX_PHYS_ADDR) {
>> + pr_info("NUMA: Ignoring memory range 0x%lx - 0x%llx\n",
>> + ULONG_MAX, base + end);
>> + end = MAX_PHYS_ADDR - base;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (base + end < phys_offset) {
>> + pr_warn("NUMA: Ignoring memory block 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
>> + base, base + end);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> + if (base < phys_offset) {
>> + pr_info("NUMA: Ignoring memory range 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
>> + base, phys_offset);
>> + end -= phys_offset - base;
>> + base = phys_offset;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return numa_add_memblk_to(nid, base, base + end, &numa_meminfo);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(numa_add_memblk);
>
> I take it this is only used to look up the node for a given mermoy
> region, rather than any region describe being usable by the kernel?
> Otherwise that rounding of the base is worrying.
yes this is to look up node for a memblock.
>
>> +
>> +/* Initialize NODE_DATA for a node on the local memory */
>> +static void __init setup_node_data(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
>> +{
>> + const size_t nd_size = roundup(sizeof(pg_data_t), PAGE_SIZE);
>> + u64 nd_pa;
>> + void *nd;
>> + int tnid;
>> +
>> + start = roundup(start, ZONE_ALIGN);
>> +
>> + pr_info("Initmem setup node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
>> + nid, start, end - 1);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Allocate node data. Try node-local memory and then any node.
>> + */
>> + nd_pa = memblock_alloc_nid(nd_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES, nid);
>
> Why was nd_size rounded to PAGE_SIZE earlier if we only care about
it is just aligned to pg_data_t too.
> SMP_CACHE_BYTES alignment? I had assumed we wanted naturally-aligned
> pages, but that doesn't seem to be the case given the above.
what is the concern here?
>
>> + if (!nd_pa) {
>> + nd_pa = __memblock_alloc_base(nd_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES,
>> + MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE);
>> + if (!nd_pa) {
>> + pr_err("Cannot find %zu bytes in node %d\n",
>> + nd_size, nid);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + nd = __va(nd_pa);
>
> Isn't memblock_alloc_try_nid sufficient for the above?
thanks, will replace with memblock_alloc_try_nid.
>
>> +
>> + /* report and initialize */
>> + pr_info(" NODE_DATA [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
>> + nd_pa, nd_pa + nd_size - 1);
>> + tnid = early_pfn_to_nid(nd_pa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>> + if (tnid != nid)
>> + pr_info(" NODE_DATA(%d) on node %d\n", nid, tnid);
>> +
>> + node_data[nid] = nd;
>> + memset(NODE_DATA(nid), 0, sizeof(pg_data_t));
>> + NODE_DATA(nid)->node_id = nid;
>> + NODE_DATA(nid)->node_start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> + NODE_DATA(nid)->node_spanned_pages = (end - start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> +
>> + node_set_online(nid);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Set nodes, which have memory in @mi, in *@nodemask.
>> + */
>> +static void __init numa_nodemask_from_meminfo(nodemask_t *nodemask,
>> + const struct numa_meminfo *mi)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mi->blk); i++)
>> + if (mi->blk[i].start != mi->blk[i].end &&
>> + mi->blk[i].nid != NUMA_NO_NODE)
>> + node_set(mi->blk[i].nid, *nodemask);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Sanity check to catch more bad NUMA configurations (they are amazingly
>> + * common). Make sure the nodes cover all memory.
>> + */
>
> This comment is surprising, given this functionality is brand new.
sorry. this is from x86, will remove it.
>
>> +static bool __init numa_meminfo_cover_memory(const struct numa_meminfo *mi)
>> +{
>> + u64 numaram, totalram;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + numaram = 0;
>> + for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
>> + u64 s = mi->blk[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> + u64 e = mi->blk[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> +
>> + numaram += e - s;
>> + numaram -= __absent_pages_in_range(mi->blk[i].nid, s, e);
>> + if ((s64)numaram < 0)
>> + numaram = 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + totalram = max_pfn - absent_pages_in_range(0, max_pfn);
>> +
>> + /* We seem to lose 3 pages somewhere. Allow 1M of slack. */
>
> We shouldn't rely on magic like this.
>
> Where and why are we "losing" pages, and why is that considered ok?
need to experiment to know that is applicable still.
will remove, if not relavant for us.
>
>> + if ((s64)(totalram - numaram) >= (1 << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT))) {
>> + pr_err("NUMA: nodes only cover %lluMB of your %lluMB Total RAM. Not used.\n",
>> + (numaram << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 20,
>> + (totalram << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 20);
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * numa_reset_distance - Reset NUMA distance table
>> + *
>> + * The current table is freed.
>> + * The next numa_set_distance() call will create a new one.
>> + */
>> +void __init numa_reset_distance(void)
>> +{
>> + size_t size = numa_distance_cnt * numa_distance_cnt *
>> + sizeof(numa_distance[0]);
>> +
>> + /* numa_distance could be 1LU marking allocation failure, test cnt */
>> + if (numa_distance_cnt)
>> + memblock_free(__pa(numa_distance), size);
>> + numa_distance_cnt = 0;
>> + numa_distance = NULL; /* enable table creation */
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __init numa_alloc_distance(void)
>> +{
>> + nodemask_t nodes_parsed;
>> + size_t size;
>> + int i, j, cnt = 0;
>> + u64 phys;
>> +
>> + /* size the new table and allocate it */
>> + nodes_parsed = numa_nodes_parsed;
>> + numa_nodemask_from_meminfo(&nodes_parsed, &numa_meminfo);
>> +
>> + for_each_node_mask(i, nodes_parsed)
>> + cnt = i;
>> + cnt++;
>> + size = cnt * cnt * sizeof(numa_distance[0]);
>> +
>> + phys = memblock_find_in_range(0, PFN_PHYS(max_pfn),
>> + size, PAGE_SIZE);
>> + if (!phys) {
>> + pr_warn("NUMA: Warning: can't allocate distance table!\n");
>> + /* don't retry until explicitly reset */
>> + numa_distance = (void *)1LU;
>
> This doesn't look good. Why do we need to set this to a non-pointer
> value?
to avoid further attempts until unless table is reset.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> + memblock_reserve(phys, size);
>> +
>> + numa_distance = __va(phys);
>> + numa_distance_cnt = cnt;
>> +
>> + /* fill with the default distances */
>> + for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++)
>> + for (j = 0; j < cnt; j++)
>> + numa_distance[i * cnt + j] = i == j ?
>> + LOCAL_DISTANCE : REMOTE_DISTANCE;
>> + pr_debug("NUMA: Initialized distance table, cnt=%d\n", cnt);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * numa_set_distance - Set NUMA distance from one NUMA to another
>> + * @from: the 'from' node to set distance
>> + * @to: the 'to' node to set distance
>> + * @distance: NUMA distance
>> + *
>> + * Set the distance from node @from to @to to @distance. If distance table
>> + * doesn't exist, one which is large enough to accommodate all the currently
>> + * known nodes will be created.
>> + *
>> + * If such table cannot be allocated, a warning is printed and further
>> + * calls are ignored until the distance table is reset with
>> + * numa_reset_distance().
>> + *
>> + * If @from or @to is higher than the highest known node or lower than zero
>> + * at the time of table creation or @distance doesn't make sense, the call
>> + * is ignored.
>> + * This is to allow simplification of specific NUMA config implementations.
>> + */
>> +void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance)
>> +{
>> + if (!numa_distance && numa_alloc_distance() < 0)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + if (from >= numa_distance_cnt || to >= numa_distance_cnt ||
>> + from < 0 || to < 0) {
>> + pr_warn_once("NUMA: Warning: node ids are out of bound, from=%d to=%d distance=%d\n",
>> + from, to, distance);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if ((u8)distance != distance ||
>> + (from == to && distance != LOCAL_DISTANCE)) {
>> + pr_warn_once("NUMA: Warning: invalid distance parameter, from=%d to=%d distance=%d\n",
>> + from, to, distance);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + numa_distance[from * numa_distance_cnt + to] = distance;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(numa_set_distance);
>> +
>> +int __node_distance(int from, int to)
>> +{
>> + if (from >= numa_distance_cnt || to >= numa_distance_cnt)
>> + return from == to ? LOCAL_DISTANCE : REMOTE_DISTANCE;
>> + return numa_distance[from * numa_distance_cnt + to];
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__node_distance);
>> +
>> +static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long uninitialized_var(pfn_align);
>> + int i, nid;
>> +
>> + /* Account for nodes with cpus and no memory */
>> + node_possible_map = numa_nodes_parsed;
>> + numa_nodemask_from_meminfo(&node_possible_map, mi);
>> + if (WARN_ON(nodes_empty(node_possible_map)))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
>> + struct numa_memblk *mb = &mi->blk[i];
>> +
>> + memblock_set_node(mb->start, mb->end - mb->start,
>> + &memblock.memory, mb->nid);
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If sections array is gonna be used for pfn -> nid mapping, check
>> + * whether its granularity is fine enough.
>> + */
>> +#ifdef NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS
>> + pfn_align = node_map_pfn_alignment();
>> + if (pfn_align && pfn_align < PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
>> + pr_warn("Node alignment %lluMB < min %lluMB, rejecting NUMA config\n",
>> + PFN_PHYS(pfn_align) >> 20,
>> + PFN_PHYS(PAGES_PER_SECTION) >> 20);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +#endif
>> + if (!numa_meminfo_cover_memory(mi))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + /* Finally register nodes. */
>> + for_each_node_mask(nid, node_possible_map) {
>> + u64 start = PFN_PHYS(max_pfn);
>> + u64 end = 0;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
>> + if (nid != mi->blk[i].nid)
>> + continue;
>> + start = min(mi->blk[i].start, start);
>> + end = max(mi->blk[i].end, end);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (start < end)
>> + setup_node_data(nid, start, end);
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Dump memblock with node info and return. */
>> + memblock_dump_all();
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void))
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + nodes_clear(numa_nodes_parsed);
>> + nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
>> + nodes_clear(node_online_map);
>> + numa_reset_distance();
>> +
>> + ret = init_func();
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = numa_register_memblks(&numa_meminfo);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + setup_node_to_cpumask_map();
>> +
>> + /* init boot processor */
>> + map_cpu_to_node(0, 0);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dummy_numa_init - Fallback dummy NUMA init
>> + *
>> + * Used if there's no underlying NUMA architecture, NUMA initialization
>> + * fails, or NUMA is disabled on the command line.
>> + *
>> + * Must online at least one node and add memory blocks that cover all
>> + * allowed memory. This function must not fail.
>> + */
>> +static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
>> +{
>> + pr_info("%s\n", "No NUMA configuration found");
>> + pr_info("Faking a node at [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n",
>> + 0LLU, PFN_PHYS(max_pfn) - 1);
>> + node_set(0, numa_nodes_parsed);
>> + numa_add_memblk(0, 0, PFN_PHYS(max_pfn));
>> + numa_off = 1;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * arm64_numa_init - Initialize NUMA
>> + *
>> + * Try each configured NUMA initialization method until one succeeds. The
>> + * last fallback is dummy single node config encomapssing whole memory and
>> + * never fails.
>> + */
>> +void __init arm64_numa_init(void)
>> +{
>> + numa_init(dummy_numa_init);
>> +}
>> --
>> 1.8.1.4
>>
thanks
Ganapat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
