On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 06:26:55PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Btw, how much of this is implementing generic A57 functionality?
>
> The driver is entirely A57 generic.
>
> > If a lot, can we make this a generic a57_edac driver so that multiple
> > vendors can use it?
>
> Yes.
Ok, cool.
> > How fast and how ugly can something like that become?
>
> Not sure I follow.
In the sense that some vendor might require just a little bit different
handling or maybe wants to read some vendor-specific registers in
addition to the architectural ones.
Then we'll start adding vendor-specific hacks to that generic driver.
And therefore the question how fast and how ugly such hacks would
become.
I guess we'll worry about that when we get there...
So Brijesh, if you only need generic, architectural functionality,
please call it arm64_edac or so and let's add it so that other arm64
vendors can use it too.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
