On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 09:40:48AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On 19 October 2015 at 17:19, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 05:13:22PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> To smooth the transition to late probes, make disabled the default for > >> DELAY_DEVICE_PROBES and let individual SoCs enable the option as they > >> get fixed. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/g/20151016181129.GA1764@xxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > >> --- > >> > >> Hi Rob, > >> > >> I'm sending this in case you think it would be best to leave the > >> on-demand probe series in -next for now but have late probes disabled to > >> avoid hassle to some people. > > > > I would like Rob to just drop this series please, I don't agree with it > > at all at the moment. > > Hi Greg, > > is it the case that you are satisfied with deferred probes as a way of > ordering device probing and that I should look at how to solve my > problem by improving it? Yes, especially given that you have said this does not speed up your boot times, which I thought was your main goal here :( If deferred probes doesn't work well, we can fix it, but for now it seems our best option. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
