On 10/14, Ray Jui wrote: > > > On 10/14/2015 8:44 AM, Jon Mason wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 03:24:52PM -0700, Ray Jui wrote: > >> Same as this patch. I thought device tree binding document should go > >> with the clock driver changes. > >> > >> Strictly speaking, device tree binding document should always go before > >> the driver changes. In the binding document the DT interface is defined, > >> then changes are implemented in the driver. > > > > I split them off this way due to the clk maintainer not wanting to > > pull in any device tree changes. Since the documentation is for the > > device tree enties, it makes logical sense to me that they be in the > > same device tree series. If Stephen will pull these in with the clk > > changes, I am more than happy to have it done by him :) > > > > Thanks, > > Jon > > Yeah the clock maintainers do not pull in device tree changes like > *.dtsi and *.dts. But they do take changes including the binding > documents and clock driver changes. You can confirm with Stephen. > Yes we take bindings (I know I'm replying to an old patch). -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
