On 14/10/15 21:07, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@xxxxxxxxx> --- include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stm32.h | 12 + include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/stm32f429-pinfunc.h | 1241 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 1253 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stm32.h create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/stm32f429-pinfunc.h diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stm32.h b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stm32.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a2e7222 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stm32.h @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_PINCTRL_STM32_H +#define _DT_BINDINGS_PINCTRL_STM32_H + +#define STM32_PIN_NO(x) ((x) << 8) +#define STM32_GET_PIN_NO(x) ((x) >> 8) +#define STM32_GET_PIN_FUNC(x) ((x) & 0xff) + +#define STM32_PIN_GPIO 0 +#define STM32_PIN_AF(x) ((x) + 1) +#define STM32_PIN_ANALOG (STM32_PIN_AF(15) + 1) + +#endif /* _DT_BINDINGS_PINCTRL_STM32_H */ diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/stm32f429-pinfunc.h b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/stm32f429-pinfunc.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..979e4eb --- /dev/null +++ b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/stm32f429-pinfunc.h @@ -0,0 +1,1241 @@ +#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_STM32F429_PINFUNC_H +#define _DT_BINDINGS_STM32F429_PINFUNC_H + +#include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stm32.h> + +#define STM32F429_PA0_FUNC_GPIO (STM32_PIN_NO(0) | STM32_PIN_GPIO) +#define STM32F429_PA0_FUNC_TIM2_CH1 TIM2_ETR (STM32_PIN_NO(0) | STM32_PIN_AF(1))
For the clock driver I was advised to get rid of this sort of "heroics" and expose raw numbers from the datasheet directly to DT bindings users.
Should the same logic apply to this *huge* collection of macros? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
