Hi Maxime, Maxime Ripard schrieb am 07.10.2015 19:49: > Hi Timo, > > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 05:49:18PM +0200, Timo Sigurdsson wrote: >> Hi Kevin, >> Hi Maxime, >> >> Kevin Hilman schrieb am 07.10.2015 16:36: >> >> > "Timo Sigurdsson" <public_timo.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> I still think that the lower voltages may be the cause of your problem >> >> with that specific board, so could you please test the attached patch on >> >> top of my patch that you first experienced the problem with? Please let >> >> us know whether this solves your issue or whether we need to dig deeper. >> > >> > Thanks for the patch. Looks like it's the OPPs. >> > >> > I went back to next-20150923 and verified it still fails. Then, I >> > applied your patch and saw that it boots just fine. >> >> Good. Then we can easily fix this, I guess. >> >> @Maxime: How should we handle this? In its current form, the patch applies >> only to the BananaPi dts by overriding the inherited opp from the SoC dtsi. >> In an earlier discussion, it was said that this can be done, even though it >> might not be the most elegant approach. But then again, I think it >> shouldn't be necessary to change the opp in the sun7i-a20.dtsi for all A20 >> boards since this is - to my knowledge - the first and only report that an >> A20 board has stability issues at the lower voltages (although not too many >> boards use voltage scaling yet). > > If you count only the number of boards, indeed, but if you count the > number of devices actually used in the field, we cover already a > significant portion of them. > >> So, would you prefer to keep this as a patch for BananaPi only, or >> change the dtsi for all A20 devices instead? > > Yeah, we probably can keep that for bananapi only at the moment, and > try to generalize that afterwards. Ok. > >> In case we keep it as it is, what is the correct commit to point to as >> "Fixes commit ..."? I'd say it fixes the initial opp commit for A20, since >> that's where these voltages were defined. But then again, if we don't >> change the dtsi, should I point to my regulator patch instead? > > I don't think it fixes anything at this point. We droped your commit > that was using the A20 OPPs, so in the history so far we don't have > anything to fix, just enable cpufreq again. Ok. I'll send a third version of the regulator patch then with the updated opp included. Thanks, Timo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
