Hi Stephen,
No there is no reason. I will fix it.
Thanks for review.
Best regards
Gabriel
On 6 October 2015 at 20:06, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10/05, Gabriel Fernandez wrote:
>> @@ -452,7 +651,7 @@ static const struct clk_ops st_pll1200c32_ops = {
>> static struct clk * __init clkgen_pll_register(const char *parent_name,
>> struct clkgen_pll_data *pll_data,
>> void __iomem *reg,
>> - const char *clk_name)
>> + const char *clk_name, spinlock_t *lock)
>
> Is there a reason we pass lock here but never use it in this
> function?
>
>> {
>> struct clkgen_pll *pll;
>> struct clk *clk;
>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
