Hi Daniel, Thanks for your help to explain the patch. On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 18:25 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote: > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Matthias Brugger > <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> But then we at least need a corresponding change to the binding documentation. I'll send a new patch with changing binding document. > If the existing bindings are not used anywhere yet (*), it seems like > unnecessary overhead to enforce backwards compatibility at this stage. > > (*) I don't actually know if this is true, perhaps only Mediatek can > answer this. What does the meaning of existing bindings are used anywhere? Do you mean this binding is used by other SoCs ? Currently scpsys driver can't be shared between different Mediatek SoCs because the power domains are different from each other. So I think it should no need to maintain backward compatibility on scpsys's binding. > > Apart from that, please send the dtsi part as a seperate patch. OK. Best regards, James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
