Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi Punit, > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:36:14AM +0100, Punit Agrawal wrote: >> Hi Sascha, >> >> Re-posting a comment from v7. Perhaps you missed it... > > Uh, sorry. In fact I didn't miss it and I thought I have answered it. > Appearantly I haven't. > >> > + struct mtk_thermal *mt = bank->mt; >> > + int temp, i, max; >> > + u32 raw; >> > + >> > + temp = max = INT_MIN; >> > + >> > + for (i = 0; i < bank_data[bank->id].num_sensors; i++) { >> > + raw = readl(mt->thermal_base + sensing_points[i].msr); >> > + >> > + temp = raw_to_mcelsius(mt, raw); >> > + >> > + /* >> > + * The first read of a sensor often contains very high bogus >> > + * temperature value. Filter these out so that the system does >> > + * not immediately shut down. >> > + */ >> > + if (temp > 200000) >> > + temp = 0; >> > + >> >> If the bogus value is only the first time the sensor is read, instead of >> filtering here, you could call mtk_thermal_bank_temperature at probe >> time when you are initialising the banks and ignore the returned value. > > It seems that after initialization the hardware needs some time to > settle before correct values can be read. Doing what you suggest would > mean we have to delay the boot by several 100ms. I'd rather not do that. Fair enough. Thanks for clarifying. > > Sascha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html