On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 03:10:04PM -0500, Andrew F. Davis wrote: > On 09/25/2015 01:05 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 09:52:53AM -0500, Andrew F. Davis wrote: > >>+ match = of_match_device(tps65912_regulator_of_match_table, &pdev->dev); > >>+ if (!match) > >>+ return -ENODEV; > >>+ template = match->data; > >>+ id = template->id; > >>+ init_data = of_get_regulator_init_data(&pdev->dev, pdev->dev.of_node, > >>+ ®ulators[id]); > >Don't open code this stuff, use the core DT matching in the > >regulator_desc instead. > I assume you are referring to your additions in a0c7b164ad11? If so I'm not Please don't refer to commits by ID only, include a human readable description of the commit for the benefit of any humans who might read your mail. > sure that will save me anything as my probe function is called with a DT > match already, so no searching is needed. You've not understood what that change is replacing, the code I'm quoting above is exactly that code. Check out some of the existing drivers using this API. > >Please also use subject lines mathcing the style for the subsystem. > I'm not sure I know what you mean? What is wrong with my subject line, it looks > like the others I've looked at? You are using "regulators:", the regulator API uses "regulator:" - this should be really clear if you do something like a git shortlog.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
