On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Oleksij Rempel <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [Me] >> Why is it necessary for the driver to copy one description of >> the pin into another? > > If i understand it correctly, pinctrl_pin_desc is essential part of > pinmux framework. Theoretically i should define just statical array of > this struct, but by this number of pins and functions it hard to keep it > readable and error free. So i decided to create asm9260_mux_table which > contains every thing i need. The side effect is higher memory usage > since i need to create pinctrl_pin_desc on fly. > > May be i miss some thing? I don't see how having code copying data from one data container to another makes things "more readable and error free". Go for *one* static definition. Also the memory waste is a total no-no. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
