Hi Daniel, thank you for the comments. Am Dienstag, den 22.09.2015, 11:38 +0200 schrieb Daniel Vetter: [...] > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..fc071fe > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,471 @@ [...] > > +static int mtk_atomic_commit(struct drm_device *dev, > > + struct drm_atomic_state *state, > > + bool async) > > +{ > > + return drm_atomic_helper_commit(dev, state, false); > > This isn't a proper async commit operation, it will still block userspace > unecessarily. See e.g. the vc4 patches for a proper one. I'll drop this function and assign .atomic_commit to drm_atomic_helper_commit directly. [...] > > +static int mtk_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane, > > + struct drm_plane_state *state) > > +{ [...] > > + ret = drm_plane_helper_check_update(plane, state->crtc, fb, > > + &src, &dest, &clip, > > + DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING, > > + DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING, > > + true, true, &visible); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > + > > + if (!visible) > > + return 0; > > + > > + mtk_plane->disp_size = (dest.y2 - dest.y1) << 16 | (dest.x2 - dest.x1); > > I think it might work out ok but it's very fragile to update object state > from your atomic_check hooks - atomic allows a TEST_ONLY mode and if > that's used (generic userspace will do that a few times for each frame at > least) then you clobber shared state. Instead it's better to store that in > your own mtk_plane_state which subclasses drm_plane_state. Ok, will do. [...] > > +static void mtk_plane_attach_zpos_property(struct drm_plane *plane, > > + unsigned int zpos, unsigned int max_plane) > > +{ > > + struct drm_device *dev = plane->dev; > > + struct mtk_drm_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > > + struct drm_property *prop; > > + > > + prop = dev_priv->plane_zpos_property; > > + if (!prop) { > > + prop = drm_property_create_range(dev, DRM_MODE_PROP_IMMUTABLE, > > + "zpos", 0, max_plane - 1); > > I know that there's lots of other drivers exposing zpos already, but I > really think we should standardize this properly and document what it > means. So > - add a bit more text to the kerneldoc/doobook, especially what should > happen when there's a conflict in zpos. > - move zpos registration/decoding into drm core, which means adding it to > drm_plane_state > - have an open-source implementation using this somewhere (ddx, wayland, > hwc, ...). > > I think for now it's better to drop the zpos property from initial > mediatek enabling. Alright, I'll separate this from the initial patchset. best regards Philipp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html