> On 16.09.2015, at 06:12, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 09/04/2015 01:26 AM, Martin Sperl wrote:
>>
>>> On 26.08.2015, at 03:44, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/24/2015 02:40 AM, kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>
>>>> +Example:
>>>> +
>>>> +aux_enable: aux_enable@0x7e215004 {
>>>> + compatible = "bcrm,bcm2835-aux";
>>>> + reg = <0x7e215004 0x04>;
>>>
>>> I'd expect that to be <0x7e215000 0x8>;
>>
>> The reason is that we just handle enable with this driver,
>> which just requires access to the 0x7e215004 register.
>>
>> The 0x7e215000 register (interrupt mask) could be used by a
>> cascaded interrupt-controller, but as the spi and uart drivers
>> can run with shared interrupts this is not a necessity.
>
> The DT is supposed to describe the HW, not any particular SW's use of
> the HW. If the HW block has 2 registers, so must the DT reg property.
Please look at V6 of the patch-series, that uses Erics clock-patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
