Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: atmel-classd: DT binding for Class D audio amplifier driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






On 9/8/2015 20:23, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 05:36:13PM +0800, Wu, Songjun wrote:
On 9/8/2015 00:25, Mark Brown wrote:

Sure, there's no problem at all having that structure in software but it
should be possible to do this without having to represent this structure
in DT.  It should be possible to register the card at the same time as
the rest of the components rather than needing the separate device in
the DT.

Do you mean using a single entry in the DT for the whole classD system and
instantiate ASoC components from it.
For now, there are two entry, they could be combined to one entry.

Yes, exactly.

I try to use one entry, but there is a problem.
It's about 'driver_data' in struct device.
In function snd_soc_register_card, the parameter 'card' will be set to 'driver_data' by the code 'dev_set_drvdata(card->dev, card)'. Then some resources(eg. regmap, clock) also need be recorded by 'driver_data'. One entry could only has one 'driver_data'. I think the best way is to create two entries, like the current dts.
What's your opinion?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux