Am Montag, 14. September 2015, 10:05:58 schrieb Sjoerd Simons: > Hey Javier, > > On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 09:50 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > > Hello Sjoerd, > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Sjoerd Simons > > > > <sjoerd.simons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > For the first patch i do prefer to keep them on so we can have get > > > some > > > more testing with this board before fine-tuning those things > > > (fwiw, > > > > Ok. > > > > > the rockchip evb board and others with essentially the same pmic > > > setup > > > all also have them always-on) > > > > Yes but I believe that's because it was easier and there are > > regulators on these boards that don't need to be always-on as well. > > Yes what i was trying to say is that it's not an uncommon to keep these > on for convenience while fine-tuning the device-tree setups ;) Also, a lot of drivers do not yet do proper regulator handling (our drm/kms driver as a prime example), so the number of regulators able to being actually turned off is quite slim. So I guess I'm ok, with handling these once driver components can actually do something with their supplies :-) . Heiko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
