On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Peter Griffin wrote: > On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Peter Griffin wrote: > > > On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Peter Griffin wrote: > > > > > > > > > These nodes are required to get the fdma driver working > > > > > on STiH407 based silicon. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi > > > > > index 838b812..da07474b 100644 > > > > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi > > > > > @@ -565,5 +565,56 @@ > > > > > <&phy_port2 PHY_TYPE_USB3>; > > > > > }; > > > > > }; > > > > > + > > > > > + fdma0: fdma0-audio@8e20000 { > > > > > > > > I'm not familiar with the FDMA driver, so can't comment knowledgeably, > > > > but the <dev> part of <dev>@<base_address> should only describe the > > > > type of hardware. I believe in this case it should just be > > > > dma@08e20000. Also notice the leading zero in the address, which I > > > > believe mitigates possible confusion. Then you be more specific with > > > > the label, so something like 'fdma-audio' seems appropriate here. > > > > > > Ok, can change to that format in v3. > > > > > > > > > > > > + compatible = "st,stih407-fdma-mpe31"; > > > > > + reg = <0x8e20000 0x20000>; > > > > > > > > I personally find padding up to 32bits helpful in the addresses. > > > > > > None of the stih407-family nodes I can see have this padding, including > > > the ones merged by you. > > > > Nither of these two facts mean it's correct. > > I thought it was a 'personal' thing. If it is mandated by the spec, then that > is different. > > > > > I'm happy to write a patch to correct them all. > > Are you sure your actually correcting anything? Where does it say you > should have a leading zero? > > > > > Bear in mind that this isn't a hard and fast rule. Both work and are > > legal. I just think the padding is more consistent. > > Surely adding a patch with how the nodes are currently formatted, is more consistent > than adding a patch with padding? I did mean consistent with the majority of DTS files, rather than just ours. There are examples of non-padded values and it's perfectly legal, but the vast majority of examples do in fact pad their addresses [see below]. The change is more of a nit than a blocker. git grep '@0[0-9|a-f]\{7\}' -- arch/arm/boot/dts/ 892 git grep '@[0-9|a-f]\{7\} ' -- arch/arm/boot/dts/ | grep -vi sti | \ grep -vi partition | grep -vi data 140 I'll probably still fix them up and resubmit some patches to bring us into line with the vast majority. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html