Re: st_fdma: Firmware filename in DT?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Friday 11 September 2015 10:17:00 Lee Jones wrote:
> <hijacking>
> 
> That doesn't work for middle-layer drivers such as Remoteproc, where
> it doesn't have its own associated firmwares.  Remoteproc's job is
> simply to load the firmware.  It doesn't care which version of the ABI
> that particular binary uses, and has no reason to.  Ideally, I guess
> the Remoteproc client should be providing the firmware name, but why
> should the client care who or what was used to load the firmware?
> 
> </hijacking>
> 

Does remoteproc use request_firmware() then? If not, it's irrelevant
to this discussion.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux