On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 03:19:44PM -0700, Chris Read wrote: > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > At least in the case of regulators those are specifically for use in > > board file cases, they should never have direct DT bindings. > My understanding, is that we're trying very hard to avoid having any board > files, and that DT use was intended to facilitate getting away from them. > Perhaps my interpretation of the need to avoid board files is extreme? Only on ARM, and in any case that code predates DT being used on ARM. > It would involve creating a kernel module (not really a driver, since > it doesn't actually control hardware) as well as modifications to the DT. Your summary pretty much matches what I'm thinking yes.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
