Matthias, On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 02:53:39 PM Pi-Cheng Chen wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On 26-08-15, 09:25, Pi-Cheng Chen wrote: >> >> The [3/3] is based on Mediatek SoC maintainer tree[1] and the patch which >> >> introduce a new clock type[2] consumed by MT8173 cpufreq driver. So it will >> >> cause some conflicts if it goes through your tree. I am not sure how this >> >> should be handled, but should it be merged through Mediatek SoC maintainer >> >> tree? >> > >> > Just get that applied to MTK tree, it doesn't have any dependency on >> > rest of the patches for build/boot. The only thing is that cpufreq >> > wouldn't work and it will work as soon as Rafael's and MTK's trees are >> > merged by Linus. >> >> Thanks for your explanation. >> >> @Rafael, Would you please apply [1,2] to your tree? > > Applied, thanks! Can you please apply [3] from this set to your dts tree? > -- > I speak only for myself. > Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html