Hi Lee,
On Tue, 01 Sep 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015, Peter Griffin wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@xxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi
> > > index 33daa49..89a363c 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi
> > > @@ -608,5 +608,53 @@
> > > status = "okay";
> > > tx-only;
> > > };
> > > +
> > > + st231_gp0: st231-gp0@0 {
> > > + compatible = "st,st231-rproc";
> > > + reg = <0x40000000 0x01000000>;
> > > + reg-names = "carveout";
> > > + resets = <&softreset STIH407_ST231_GP0_SOFTRESET>;
> >
> > Support for these co-processor reset lines does not exist upstream. So
> > this series as it stands won't compile.
>
> That's true. I have the support as part of some DEBUG patches I have
> in my branch. Are you aware of a plan for these, or should I upstream
> them myself as part of this set?
I'm not aware of any plan, so I think upstreaming as part of this set
would be good.
regards,
Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
