On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 12:01:27PM +0530, punnaiah choudary kalluri wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 08:49:33AM +0530, Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri wrote:
>> >
>> >> + list_for_each_entry_safe(desc, next, &chan->done_list, node) {
>> >> + dma_async_tx_callback callback;
>> >> + void *callback_param;
>> >> +
>> >> + list_del(&desc->node);
>> >> +
>> >> + callback = desc->async_tx.callback;
>> >> + callback_param = desc->async_tx.callback_param;
>> >> + if (callback) {
>> >> + if (in_interrupt())
>> >> + spin_unlock_bh(&chan->lock);
>> >> + else
>> >> + spin_unlock(&chan->lock);
>> >
>> > This looks bad!
>> > Why would callback be called from different context. It should only be
>> > invoked from your tasklet
>>
>> During the terminate call, driver need to clean up the existing BDs so that time
>> this function will be called from the thread or process context in
>> addition to the
>> tasklet context.
>>
>> DO you have any suggestion here ?
>
> Yes you need to terminate but you don't need to invoke user for terminate
> flow. It is not expected.
> Terminate flow expect youu to clean the channels
Ok. Thanks. I will fix this and send v5 soon.
Regards,
Punnaiah
>
> --
> ~Vinod
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
