On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:38:57PM +0200, Michael van der Westhuizen wrote: > >> > It's possible there was some discussion of the patch that made >> > it look it needed a resubmit, or that it was buried as reply in the >> > middle of discussion of some other patches (eg, a previous version). >> > Either way to repeat what I said if you want me to review a patch please >> > send me the patch. > >> I’ve just resent the series. > > You've sent them as a reply in the middle of another thread which is > something I just indicated above was a bad idea in the message you're > replying to here (it's a great way to either make it hard to figure out > what the current version of the code is or get your message deleted > along with the rest of the thread) and you've decided to label them as > [RESEND instead of [PATCH :( Michael, I believe you need to resend as a v3 in a separate thread if you aware of this code. (Though it seems already late for v4.3) -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
