Hi,
On Monday, August 17, 2015 05:24:24 PM Pi-Cheng Chen wrote:
> Mediatek MT8173 is an ARMv8 based quad-core (2*Cortex-A53 and
> 2*Cortex-A72) SoC with duall clusters. For each cluster, two voltage
> inputs, Vproc and Vsram are supplied by two regulators. For the big
> cluster, two regulators come from different PMICs. In this case, when
> scaling voltage inputs of the cluster, the voltages of two regulator
> inputs need to be controlled by software explicitly under the SoC
> specific limitation:
>
> 100mV < Vsram - Vproc < 200mV
>
> which is called 'voltage tracking' mechanism. And when scaling the
> frequency of cluster clock input, the input MUX need to be parented to
> another "intermediate" stable PLL first and reparented to the original
> PLL once the original PLL is stable at the target frequency. This patch
> implements those mechanisms to enable CPU DVFS support for Mediatek
> MT8173 SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pi-Cheng Chen <pi-cheng.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 7 +
> drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c | 524 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 532 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c
[...]
> +static struct platform_driver mt8173_cpufreq_platdrv = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "mt8173-cpufreq",
> + },
> + .probe = mt8173_cpufreq_probe,
> +};
> +
> +static int mt8173_cpufreq_driver_init(void)
> +{
> + struct platform_device *pdev;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = platform_driver_register(&mt8173_cpufreq_platdrv);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + /*
> + * Since there's no place to hold device registration code and no
> + * device tree based way to match cpufreq driver yet, both the driver
> + * and the device registration codes are put here to handle defer
> + * probing.
> + */
> + pdev = platform_device_register_simple("mt8173-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
This is not very friendly for multiplatform support
(mt8173_cpufreq_driver_init() can be called on other platforms,
i.e. Samsung Exynos7 one if ARCH_EXYNOS7 is also enabled in
the kernel config).
Why can't it be fixed with checking Device Tree with
of_machine_is_compatible("mediatek,mt8173")
(assuming that it can be used on arm64 like on arm32)?
> + if (IS_ERR(pdev)) {
> + pr_err("failed to register mtk-cpufreq platform device\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(pdev);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +device_initcall(mt8173_cpufreq_driver_init);
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
