On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 04:17:16PM +0800, YH Huang wrote:
> Add display PWM driver support to modify backlight for MT8173 and MT6595.
> The PWM has one channel to control the brightness of the display.
> When the (high_width / period) is closer to 1, the screen is brighter;
> otherwise, it is darker.
>
> Signed-off-by: YH Huang <yh.huang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 10 ++
> drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c | 232 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 243 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> index b1541f4..f5b03a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> @@ -211,6 +211,16 @@ config PWM_LPSS_PLATFORM
> To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
> will be called pwm-lpss-platform.
>
> +config PWM_MTK_DISP
> + tristate "MediaTek display PWM driver"
> + depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST
This is going to break randconfig builds. From a quick look your driver
will fail to build at least on architectures that don't set HAVE_IOMEM.
I know that's quite exotic, but I've had to deal with fallout from
things like this in the past. If you want || COMPILE_TEST you should at
least add a "depends on HAVE_IOMEM".
linux/clk.h seems to have stubs for all of the functions that you use,
so those shouldn't be a problem.
> + help
> + Generic PWM framework driver for MediaTek disp-pwm device.
> + The PWM is used to control the backlight brightness for display.
> +
> + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
> + will be called pwm-mtk-disp.
> +
> config PWM_MXS
> tristate "Freescale MXS PWM support"
> depends on ARCH_MXS && OF
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..69682a0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
> +/*
> + * MediaTek display pulse-width-modulation controller driver.
> + * Copyright (c) 2015 MediaTek Inc.
> + * Author: YH Huang <yh.huang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/pwm.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
The above two aren't correctly sorted.
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#define DISP_PWM_EN 0x00
> +#define PWM_ENABLE_MASK BIT(0)
> +
> +#define DISP_PWM_COMMIT 0x08
> +#define PWM_COMMIT_MASK BIT(0)
> +
> +#define DISP_PWM_CON_0 0x10
> +#define PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT 16
> +#define PWM_CLKDIV_MAX 0x3ff
> +#define PWM_CLKDIV_MASK (PWM_CLKDIV_MAX << PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT)
> +
> +#define DISP_PWM_CON_1 0x14
> +#define PWM_PERIOD_MASK 0xfff
> +/* Shift log2(PWM_PERIOD_MASK + 1) as divisor */
> +#define PWM_PERIOD_BIT_SHIFT 12
There are still two names for the same value here. I thought we had
agreed on this becoming something like the below?
#define PWM_PERIOD_BIT_SHIFT 12
#define PWM_PERIOD_MASK ((1 << PWM_PERIOD_BIT_SHIFT) - 1)
Although PWM_PERIOD_BIT_WIDTH would probably be a better name. Or
PWM_PERIOD_BITS or similar.
> +static int mtk_disp_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct mtk_disp_pwm *mdp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + int ret = pwmchip_remove(&mdp->chip);
I'd prefer this to be separate lines:
int ret;
ret = pwmchip_remove(&mdp->chip);
Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
