On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 11:25 -0700, Michael Turquette wrote: > Hi Scott, > > Quoting Scott Wood (2015-06-18 19:49:10) > > The existing device tree bindings are error-prone and inflexible. > > Correct the mistake by moving the knowledge into the driver, which > > has more flexibility in describing the quirks of each chip. This leaves > > the device tree to its proper role of identifying a programming interface > > rather than describing its individual registers. > > Sorry for not responding to this one sooner. Fell through the cracks. > > All of the changes to drives/clk/clk-qoriq.c look great to me. I assume > you need to keep all of these patches together and want to the take > through the freescale tree? If so feel free to add, > > Acked-by: Michael Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx> I just sent a non-RFC v2, with improved compatibility with old device trees (especially ls1021a). It depends on the cpufreq patch though (at least, to avoid breaking qoriq-cpufreq until that patch is merged), so I'll also need an ack from Rafael for that if I'm taking it through my tree. -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
