* Keerthy <a0393675@xxxxxx> [150811 10:57]:
>
>
> On Tuesday 11 August 2015 06:25 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >* Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx> [150810 02:31]:
> >>@@ -371,8 +372,10 @@ IS_OMAP_TYPE(3430, 0x3430)
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_SOC_AM43XX
> >> # undef soc_is_am43xx
> >> # undef soc_is_am437x
> >>-# define soc_is_am43xx() is_am43xx()
> >>-# define soc_is_am437x() is_am437x()
> >>+# undef soc_is_am438x
> >>+# define soc_is_am43xx() of_machine_is_compatible("ti,am43")
> >>+# define soc_is_am437x() of_machine_is_compatible("ti,am4372")
> >>+# define soc_is_am438x() of_machine_is_compatible("ti,am438x")
> >> #endif
> >
> >Hmm didn't I already comment on this change? I don't want to do it
> >for one SoC. Please add the SoC detection the old way for am43xx,
> >then do another series that changes all the DT only SoCs to use
> >of_machine_is_compatible() after it's been properly tested so now
> >regressions are caused for the early init code.
>
> Okay. I misinterpreted your earlier comment. Thanks for clarifying.
> I will re-do.
Actually, can you please do the following patches first while at it:
1. Change dra7 SoC detection to intialize soc_name and soc_rev
registers based on the of_machine_is_compatible so we don't
do pointless string comparisons with the current code
2. Add am437x detection the same way
3. Change all the existing DT only SoCs to do the same (this
can be done in a separate series)
That should allow us to drop most of the SoC detection code.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
