On Tuesday 11 August 2015 02:33 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:28:21PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On Tuesday 11 August 2015 05:17 AM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote: > >>> ping. Patches 1 and 2 have already been pulled into Mark's spi tree and are currently in in linux-next. > >> Mark, can you apply this patch to your tree as well? Thats the preferred >> route for me. > >> If thats not an option for you, can you confirm that the topic/davinci >> branch of your spi tree is an immutable commit I can base my pull >> request to ARM-SoC on? > > Why would there be any interdependency between the the two trees, that > would be very unusual? Adding a new value to DT doesn't need the kernel > to understand it and the driver should be compatible with existing DTs. > If there *is* some dependency that suggests the driver update has > problems... The dependency is because of platform data. Patch 2/4 adds a new platform data member 'prescaler_limit' which this patch populates for DaVinci devices using legacy booting. > In any case I don't have a copy of the patch any more. I can resend this patch to you with my ack included. Thanks, Sekhar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
