On 29/07/15 23:46, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 07/28/2015 05:54 AM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:+ + panel_3p3v: panel_3p3v { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + pinctrl-0 = <&disp_en_gpios>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>; + regulator-name = "panel_en_3p3v"; + regulator-type = "voltage"; + startup-delay-us = <0>; + gpio = <&pm8921_gpio 36 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + enable-active-high; + regulator-boot-on; + };We should put gpio regulators into their own container in the root of the tree. Similar to what was done for 8960 gpio regulators.
I agree, Will do this in next version.
+ + backlight: backlight{ + pinctrl-0 = <&pwm_bl_gpios>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + compatible = "gpio-backlight"; + gpios = <&pm8921_gpio 26 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + default-on; + }; + + panel: auo,b101xtn01 { + status = "okay"; + compatible = "auo,b101xtn01"; + + ddc-i2c-bus = <&i2c3>; + backlight = <&backlight>; + power-supply = <&panel_3p3v>; };These two nodes shouldn't be under the SoC node. They don't have registers so they should be at the root of the tree. And we don't need to put labels twice on nodes. If we're modifying things in board specific dtsi files it should be fine to leave the label off if the label is in the SoC dtsi file.
Yep, will fix it in next version.
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
