On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 04:35:32PM +0800, James Liao wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
>
> On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 08:53 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 04:16:54PM +0800, James Liao wrote:
> > > -static const struct mtk_fixed_factor root_clk_alias[] __initconst = {
> > > - FACTOR(CLK_TOP_CLKPH_MCK_O, "clkph_mck_o", "clk_null", 1, 1),
> > > - FACTOR(CLK_TOP_USB_SYSPLL_125M, "usb_syspll_125m", "clk_null", 1, 1),
> > > - FACTOR(CLK_TOP_HDMITX_DIG_CTS, "hdmitx_dig_cts", "clk_null", 1, 1),
> > > +static const struct mtk_fixed_clk fixed_clks[] __initconst = {
> > > + FIXED_CLK(CLK_TOP_CLKPH_MCK_O, "clkph_mck_o", "clk26m", 400 * MHZ),
> > > + FIXED_CLK(CLK_TOP_USB_SYSPLL_125M, "usb_syspll_125m", "clk26m", 125 * MHZ),
> >
> > Hm, it seems you hide PLLs in fixed factor clock. Are you sure that
> > there is a PLL in the system generating 125MHz from 26MHz which is in no
> > way configurable? Or is this really some clock derived from the syspll
> > as the clock name suggests?
>
> According to the datasheet from our clock designer, usb_syspll_125m is
> the output clock of an analog macro which is named SSUSB_PHY, and its
> input clock is AD_CLK26M_CK.
>
> SSUSB_PHY is not the same as general PLLs such as MAINPLL. So I don't
> treat it as a configurable PLL but a fixed clock with the typical rate
> 125 MHz.
Ok then.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
