On 07/30/2015 01:13 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:57:27 +0200
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 07/30/2015 11:35 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
Marvell Berlin4CT is a SoC based on 64bit ARMv8 architecture. It contains
quad CA53 cores.
This SoC shares many HW IP with BG2Q and other berlin series. This patchset
was tested on Berlin4CT DMP board, and boot to shell ok.
Since v4:
- rebased on the latest next tree
Jisheng,
some git basics, so you get a better idea of the merge process:
Please do not base your patches on linux-next. It is not a stable branch
I can refer to. Also, if there was any dependency with another feature
that your patches require, you should mention that dependency by
pointing out either a floating patch set or even better a _stable_
topic branch of the feature that will be added in the same cycle you
expect your patches to be merged.
Got it. Thanks for the kindly remind. There's only one dependency:
"arm64: Split out platform options to separate Kconfig" from Olof.
AFAIKS, the patch in question has been applied by Olof for the next
cycle and after 4.2-rc2. You just name the patch, while Olof and I
will have to work it out:
@Olof: Any specific branch you want me to base a potential PR for
the initial Berlin4CT patches on? If you prefer to pick up the
two patches directly, feel free to add my
Acked-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@xxxxxxxxx>
AFAIKS, there is no dependency at all so please just base them on -rc1
I'd like to learn more to avoid future inconvenience. This means it's better
to rebase on 4.2-rc, right?
You can rebase on anything that is considered stable, i.e. my
berlin/foo-for-4.x-n branches become stable as soon as I send out a PR
to arm-soc. Before stable I can reorder/squash/fixup any patches
in there (or anything that will change the commit hash). Once I
declare it stable and anything needs to be changed, I'll have to
apply proper patches or even apply revert patches.
Another question is: could patches be based on arm-soc tree if necessary?
for example: if I need the "arm64: Split out platform options to separate
Kconfig" commit.
Not directly, arm-soc by itself has no stable branches I know of. But
there may be stable topic branches that can be referred to but that
will be worked out on single topics by arm-soc/subsystem maintainers
and patch authors. Likely cross-subsystem patch sets or large patch
sets will end up in topic branches.
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
