Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] iommu/mediatek: Add mt8173 IOMMU driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 16:49 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 27/07/15 16:31, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 02:23:26PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> >> On 16/07/15 10:04, Yong Wu wrote:
> >>> This patch adds support for mediatek m4u (MultiMedia Memory Management
> >>> Unit).
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> [...]
> >>> +static void mtk_iommu_flush_pgtable(void *ptr, size_t size, void *cookie)
> >>> +{
> >>> +       struct mtk_iommu_domain *domain = cookie;
> >>> +       unsigned long offset = (unsigned long)ptr & ~PAGE_MASK;
> >>> +
> >>> +       dma_map_page(domain->data->dev, virt_to_page(ptr), offset,
> >>> +                    size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> >>
> >> Nit: this looks like it may as well be dma_map_single.
> >>
> >> It would probably be worth following it with a matching unmap too, just to
> >> avoid any possible leakage bugs (especially if this M4U ever appears in a
> >> SoC supporting RAM above the 32-bit boundary).
> >
> > Why not do the job properly?  Take a look at how I implemented the
> > streaming DMA API on Tegra SMMU (patch set recently sent out earlier
> > today).
> >
> > There's no need for hacks like dma_map_page() (and discarding it's
> > return value) or dma_map_page() followed by dma_unmap_page().
> 
> Indeed, as it happens I do have a branch where I prototyped that for the 
> long-descriptor io-pgtable-arm code a while ago; this discussion has 
> prompted me to dig it up again. Stay tuned, folks...

Hi Russell, Robin,

     From I see in arm-smmu-v3.c in v4.2-rc1, 
     
     The flush_pgtable seems like this:
//==========
	dma_addr_t dma_addr;

	dma_addr = dma_map_page(dev, ptr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);

	if (dma_mapping_error(dev, dma_addr))
		dev_err(dev, "failed to flush pgtable at %p\n", ptr);
	else
		dma_unmap_page(dev, dma_addr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
//==========
       I will change map like this and use dma_map_single instead.

       Is this also seems to be not proper?

       Then how to do it?  add this before unmap? :
       dma_sync_single_for_device(dev, dma_addr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);

> 
> Robin.
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux