Hi,
On 23/07/15 17:54, Vignesh R wrote:
> On am437x-gp-evm, pixcir touchscreen can wake the system from low power
> state by generating wake-up interrupt via pinctrl and IO daisy chain.
> Add support for optional wakeup interrupt source by regsitering to
> automated wake IRQ framework introduced by commit 4990d4fe327b ("PM /
> Wakeirq: Add automated device wake IRQ handling").
> This is similar in approach to commit 2a0b965cfb6e ("serial: omap: Add
> support for optional wake-up")
>
> Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <vigneshr@xxxxxx>
> ---
>
> v3:
> * handle error code returned by of_irq_get_byname()
>
> v2:
> * use of_irq_get_byname()
> * remove enable/disable_wake_irq()
>
> drivers/input/touchscreen/pixcir_i2c_ts.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
> include/linux/input/pixcir_ts.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/pixcir_i2c_ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/pixcir_i2c_ts.c
> index 8f3e243a62bf..3a4ab358bf52 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/pixcir_i2c_ts.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/pixcir_i2c_ts.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_wakeirq.h>
>
> #define PIXCIR_MAX_SLOTS 5 /* Max fingers supported by driver */
>
> @@ -364,8 +366,6 @@ static int __maybe_unused pixcir_i2c_ts_suspend(struct device *dev)
> goto unlock;
> }
> }
> -
> - enable_irq_wake(client->irq);
> } else if (input->users) {
> ret = pixcir_stop(ts);
> }
> @@ -386,8 +386,6 @@ static int __maybe_unused pixcir_i2c_ts_resume(struct device *dev)
> mutex_lock(&input->mutex);
>
> if (device_may_wakeup(&client->dev)) {
> - disable_irq_wake(client->irq);
> -
> if (!input->users) {
> ret = pixcir_stop(ts);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -445,6 +443,13 @@ static struct pixcir_ts_platform_data *pixcir_parse_dt(struct device *dev)
> dev_dbg(dev, "%s: x %d, y %d, gpio %d\n", __func__,
> pdata->x_max + 1, pdata->y_max + 1, pdata->gpio_attb);
>
> + pdata->wakeirq = of_irq_get_byname(dev->of_node, "wakeup");
> + if (pdata->wakeirq < 0 && pdata->wakeirq != -ENODATA &&
> + pdata->wakeirq != -EINVAL) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get wakeirq\n");
> + return ERR_PTR(pdata->wakeirq);
> + }
> +
> return pdata;
> }
> #else
> @@ -564,11 +569,20 @@ static int pixcir_i2c_ts_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> i2c_set_clientdata(client, tsdata);
> device_init_wakeup(&client->dev, 1);
>
> + /* Register wakeirq */
> + error = (pdata->wakeirq > 0) ?
> + dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(dev, pdata->wakeirq) :
> + dev_pm_set_wake_irq(dev, client->irq);
Can 0 be a valid wakeirq or client->irq?
If yes then this logic is broken.
I would set wakeirq to -EINVAL or something if it is not available
during probe and check for that condition.
> + if (error)
> + dev_info(dev, "unable to setup wakeirq %d\n",
> + error);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> static int pixcir_i2c_ts_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> {
> + dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(&client->dev);
> device_init_wakeup(&client->dev, 0);
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/include/linux/input/pixcir_ts.h b/include/linux/input/pixcir_ts.h
> index 7bae83b7c396..da573de5a5ee 100644
> --- a/include/linux/input/pixcir_ts.h
> +++ b/include/linux/input/pixcir_ts.h
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ struct pixcir_ts_platform_data {
> int x_max;
> int y_max;
> int gpio_attb; /* GPIO connected to ATTB line */
> + int wakeirq;
> struct pixcir_i2c_chip_data chip;
> };
>
>
cheers,
-roger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
