On 15/07/15 14:02, Stefan Agner wrote:
> On 2015-07-15 03:57, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 07:23:23PM +0530, Sanchayan Maity wrote:
>>> Add a device tree property which allows to specify the minimum sample
>>> time which can be used to calculate the actual ADC cycles required
>>> depending on the hardware.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sanchayan Maity <maitysanchayan@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/vf-colibri.dtsi | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf-colibri.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf-colibri.dtsi
>>> index ab10d2e..59f5deb 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf-colibri.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf-colibri.dtsi
>>> @@ -16,10 +16,12 @@
>>> };
>>>
>>> &adc0 {
>>> + min-sample-time = <1000>;
>>> status = "okay";
>>> };
>>>
>>> &adc1 {
>>> + min-sample-time = <1000>;
>>
>> Since this is the default value anyway, we can just save the patch,
>> right?
>
> I thought it would be nice to be explicit here and define this value
> which we verified internally.
>
> On the other hand, we did not derived the minimum value from the DS
> (using the capacity/resistance of the actual analog source connected) to
> maximize the sampling frequency, hence I'm also ok with not explicitly
> defining a value.
I'll drop this patch then and we are all happy (I think)
>
> --
> Stefan
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
