On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 01:39:44PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > From: Vince Hsu <vinceh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Tegra114 has a HW bug that the PLLD/PLLD2 lock bit cannot be asserted when > the DIS power domain is during up-powergating process but the clamp to this I think there is missing 'off' in this sentence? ie. ... 'the DIS power domain is off during up-powergating process' Also 'un-powergating sequence' would be nicer. > domain is not removed yet. That causes a timeout and aborts the power > sequence, although the PLLD/PLLD2 has already locked. To remove the false > alarm, we don't use the lock for PLLD/PLLD2. Just wait 1ms and treat the > clocks as locked. > > Signed-off-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c > index 8237d16b4075..2e5c20c7c088 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c > @@ -456,8 +456,7 @@ static struct tegra_clk_pll_params pll_d_params = { > .lock_delay = 1000, > .div_nmp = &pllp_nmp, > .freq_table = pll_d_freq_table, > - .flags = TEGRA_PLL_HAS_CPCON | TEGRA_PLL_SET_LFCON | > - TEGRA_PLL_USE_LOCK, > + .flags = TEGRA_PLL_HAS_CPCON | TEGRA_PLL_SET_LFCON, > }; > > static struct tegra_clk_pll_params pll_d2_params = { > @@ -474,8 +473,7 @@ static struct tegra_clk_pll_params pll_d2_params = { > .lock_delay = 1000, > .div_nmp = &pllp_nmp, > .freq_table = pll_d_freq_table, > - .flags = TEGRA_PLL_HAS_CPCON | TEGRA_PLL_SET_LFCON | > - TEGRA_PLL_USE_LOCK, > + .flags = TEGRA_PLL_HAS_CPCON | TEGRA_PLL_SET_LFCON, > }; > > static struct pdiv_map pllu_p[] = { > -- > 2.1.4 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html