On 07/09/2015 10:15 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: > On Thursday 09 July 2015 07:03 AM, Peter Hurley wrote: [...] >>> @@ -1307,6 +1320,36 @@ static int omap8250_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) >>> return -EBUSY; >>> } >>> >>> + if (priv->habit & UART_ERRATA_CLOCK_DISABLE) { >>> + int sysc; >>> + int syss; >>> + int timeout = 100; >>> + >>> + sysc = serial_in(up, UART_OMAP_SYSC); >>> + >>> + /* softreset the UART */ >>> + sysc |= OMAP_UART_SYSC_SOFTRESET; >>> + serial_out(up, UART_OMAP_SYSC, sysc); >>> + >>> + /* By experiments, 1us enough for reset complete on AM335x */ >>> + do { >>> + udelay(1); >>> + syss = serial_in(up, UART_OMAP_SYSS); >>> + } while (--timeout && !(syss & OMAP_UART_SYSS_RESETDONE)); >> >> >> If there is not a omap helper function to reset modules, there should be. >> Open-coding the module reset is not appropriate. > > There is work planned to have something implemented for OMAP as part of > drivers/reset/ API. AFAIK, this depends on some PRCM code clean-up > affecting multiple OMAP platforms and is couple of merge windows away > from taking shape. > > Meanwhile, I think this is the best we can do. Other drivers like > i2c-omap have done something similar (see omap_i2c_reset()). Ok, then please make the reset a separate local function (returning success/failure?). omap_8250_reset()? A TODO or FIXME above it explaining the temporary nature of the function would be appreciated :) >> >>> + if (!timeout) { >>> + dev_err(dev, "timed out waiting for reset done\n"); >>> + return -ETIMEDOUT; >>> + } >>> + >>> + /* >>> + * For UART module wake-up to work, MDR1.MODESELECT should >>> + * not be set to "Disable", so update it. >>> + */ >>> + if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) >>> + omap8250_update_mdr1(up, priv); >> >> Should this be unconditional? > > I do not see it doing any harm if done unconditionally. But it will be > unnecessary. Unless the UART is being used for wakeup, we don't need > MDR1 restored at this stage. And omap8250_restore_regs() will eventually > restore the register anyway. Yeah, I understand that, but special-casing it isn't adding any value; it's not as if you actually want the module to not be in UART mode. And the comment could be single-line: /* Restore to UART mode after reset (for wakeup) */ Regards, Peter Hurley -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html