Hi,
On 07-07-15 09:01, Lee Jones wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Hans de Goede wrote:
Add a cell for the usb power_supply part of the axp20x PMICs.
Note that this cell is only for the usb power_supply part and not the
ac-power / battery-charger / rtc-backup-bat-charger bits.
Depending on the board each of those must be enabled / disabled separately
in devicetree as most boards do not use all 4. So in dt each one needs its
own child-node of the axp20x node. Another reason for using separate child
nodes for each is so that other devicetree nodes can have a power-supply
property with a phandle referencing a node representing a single
power-supply.
The decision to use a separate devicetree node for each is reflected on
the kernel side by each getting its own mfd-cell / platform_device and
platform-driver.
Note this commit also makes some whitespace changes to the intialization
of existing cells in axp20x_cells, these are pure whitespace changes,
functionally nothing changes.
Cc: Bruno Prémont <bonbons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bruno Prémont <bonbons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v2:
-Use DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED
-Change indentation of axp20x_cells initializers to avoid line wrapping
Changes in v3:
-Improve commit message
-Add Bruno's S-o-b
---
drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
For my own reference:
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
Are these two patches tied to any other in the set, or can I apply
them separately?
You can apply them seperately, thanks.
I'm wondering who will take care of upstreaming the first patch of this
set: "ARM: dts: Add binding documentation for AXP20x pmic usb power supply"
If you can take that one too that would be great.
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
