Hi,
On 06-07-15 10:57, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:22:26AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 25-06-15 19:40, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:41:42PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
From: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@xxxxxxxxx>
Add a dtsi file for the axp152 pmic, this mirrors the way things are
handled for the axp202 pmic.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/axp152.dtsi | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/axp152.dtsi
Unfortunately, Mark expressed clearly that he didn't want such files.
That is not how I remember the discussion, he said that he did not consider
them useful, we explained why we do consider them useful for the sunxi
case and then things went quiet.
And we do already have an axp209.dtsi, and I find having that useful
for enabling the regulators on axp209 using boards.
Hmmm, reading this discussion again, it indeed looks like I
misremembered what he was saying.
Ultimately it is your call, but I really think we should be consistent
and add an axp152.dtsi to mirror how we do things with the axp209.
Was there any other comments on this serie (and are you going to send
a v2?) or should I apply this patch?
There were some comments on the actual mfd bits of this series, and
I will send a v2 for that sometime this week. The dts patches however
are good to go, so please apply this one.
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
