On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, Paul Osmialowski wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > I wonder if you could move out the fixed rate clocks into their own > > nodes. Are they actually controlled by the same block? If they are > > just fixed, you can use the normal binding for fixed rate clocks > > and only describe the clocks that are related to the driver. > > In my view having these clocks grouped together looks more convincing. After > all, they all share the same I/O regs in order to read configuration. The fact that they share a register is not making them a group. That's just a HW design decision and you need to deal with that by protecting the register access, but not by trying to group them artificially at the functional level. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
