On 2015/7/2 1:32, James Morse wrote: > Gabriele Paoloni wrote: >>> Both series are applied to v4.1, use the same .config file, and the >>> same dtb. >>> I will investigate further. >>> >>> (Re-testing v2 works, so this isn't an interim hardware failure) >> >> This is a bit weird.... >> >> Patch 2/5 is the only one that affect platforms different from Hisilicon >> >> The only difference between V3 patch[2/5] and v2 patch[2/4] is > > Between v3:2/5 and your replacement for v2:2/4, which arrived after I had > tested the v2 series. As the patch has been replaced with a different one - > neither 'tested-by' is true any more. > Hi James, Firstly, many thanks for your test! Yes. v3:2/5 had merged Gabriele's codes in. So if you made test on original v2 patchset and v3 patchset, I think the differences include Gabriele's codes and codes in pci-keystone-dw.c. As the patch has been replaced with a different one, I think I should have added 'tested-by' after it passes your test, is this right? > It looks like the BAR containing the bridge window is not being assigned, > so no devices on bus 1 are discovered. > > I will send the full v2 and v3 dmesg output separately. > Thanks, I will debug the problem according your log. Regards, Zhou > > Thanks, > > James > > > . > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
