On Thu, 4 Jun 2015 16:42:08 +1000 , Gavin Shan <gwshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > unflatten_dt_node() is called recursively to unflatten FDT nodes > with the assumption that FDT blob has only one root node, which > isn't true when the FDT blob represents device sub-tree. The > patch improves the function to supporting device sub-tree that > have multiple root nodes: > > * Rename original unflatten_dt_node() to __unflatten_dt_node(). > * Wrapper unflatten_dt_node() calls __unflatten_dt_node() with > adjusted current node depth to 1 to avoid underflow. > > Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v5: > * Split from PATCH[v4 19/21] > * Fixed "line over 80 characters" from checkpatch.pl > --- > drivers/of/fdt.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c > index cde35c5d01..b87c157 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/fdt.c > +++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c > @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ > #include <asm/setup.h> /* for COMMAND_LINE_SIZE */ > #include <asm/page.h> > > +static int cur_node_depth; > + eeeek! We'll never be able to call this concurrently this way. That will create theoretical race conditions in the overlay code. (actually, you didn't introduce this problem, see below...) > /* > * of_fdt_limit_memory - limit the number of regions in the /memory node > * @limit: maximum entries > @@ -161,27 +163,26 @@ static void *unflatten_dt_alloc(void **mem, unsigned long size, > } > > /** > - * unflatten_dt_node - Alloc and populate a device_node from the flat tree > + * __unflatten_dt_node - Alloc and populate a device_node from the flat tree > * @blob: The parent device tree blob > * @mem: Memory chunk to use for allocating device nodes and properties > * @p: pointer to node in flat tree > * @dad: Parent struct device_node > * @fpsize: Size of the node path up at the current depth. > */ > -static void * unflatten_dt_node(void *blob, > - void *mem, > - int *poffset, > - struct device_node *dad, > - struct device_node **nodepp, > - unsigned long fpsize, > - bool dryrun) > +static void *__unflatten_dt_node(void *blob, > + void *mem, > + int *poffset, > + struct device_node *dad, > + struct device_node **nodepp, > + unsigned long fpsize, > + bool dryrun) nitpick: If you resist the temptation to reflow indentation, then the diffstat is smaller. > { > const __be32 *p; > struct device_node *np; > struct property *pp, **prev_pp = NULL; > const char *pathp; > unsigned int l, allocl; > - static int depth = 0; Hmmmm.. looks like the race condition is already there. Well that's no good. If you move *depth into the parameters to unflatten_dt_node(), then you can solve both problems at once without having to create a __ version of the function. That will be a cleaner solution overall. > int old_depth; > int offset; > int has_name = 0; > @@ -334,13 +335,19 @@ static void * unflatten_dt_node(void *blob, > np->type = "<NULL>"; > } > > - old_depth = depth; > - *poffset = fdt_next_node(blob, *poffset, &depth); > - if (depth < 0) > - depth = 0; > - while (*poffset > 0 && depth > old_depth) > - mem = unflatten_dt_node(blob, mem, poffset, np, NULL, > - fpsize, dryrun); > + old_depth = cur_node_depth; > + *poffset = fdt_next_node(blob, *poffset, &cur_node_depth); > + while (*poffset > 0) { What is the reasoning here? Why change to looking for poffset > 0? > + if (cur_node_depth < old_depth) > + break; > + > + if (cur_node_depth == old_depth) > + mem = __unflatten_dt_node(blob, mem, poffset, > + dad, NULL, fpsize, dryrun); > + else if (cur_node_depth > old_depth) > + mem = __unflatten_dt_node(blob, mem, poffset, > + np, NULL, fpsize, dryrun); Ditto here, please describe the purpose of the new logic. > + } > > if (*poffset < 0 && *poffset != -FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND) > pr_err("unflatten: error %d processing FDT\n", *poffset); > @@ -366,6 +373,18 @@ static void * unflatten_dt_node(void *blob, > return mem; > } > > +static void *unflatten_dt_node(void *blob, > + void *mem, > + int *poffset, > + struct device_node *dad, > + struct device_node **nodepp, > + bool dryrun) > +{ > + cur_node_depth = 1; > + return __unflatten_dt_node(blob, mem, poffset, > + dad, nodepp, 0, dryrun); > +} > + > /** > * __unflatten_device_tree - create tree of device_nodes from flat blob > * > @@ -405,7 +424,8 @@ static void __unflatten_device_tree(void *blob, > > /* First pass, scan for size */ > start = 0; > - size = (unsigned long)unflatten_dt_node(blob, NULL, &start, NULL, NULL, 0, true); > + size = (unsigned long)unflatten_dt_node(blob, NULL, &start, > + NULL, NULL, true); > size = ALIGN(size, 4); > > pr_debug(" size is %lx, allocating...\n", size); > @@ -420,7 +440,7 @@ static void __unflatten_device_tree(void *blob, > > /* Second pass, do actual unflattening */ > start = 0; > - unflatten_dt_node(blob, mem, &start, NULL, mynodes, 0, false); > + unflatten_dt_node(blob, mem, &start, NULL, mynodes, false); > if (be32_to_cpup(mem + size) != 0xdeadbeef) > pr_warning("End of tree marker overwritten: %08x\n", > be32_to_cpup(mem + size)); > -- > 2.1.0 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html