On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:52:23PM +0200, Paul Osmialowski wrote: > I tried it and it works. This approach does not cause code duplication, but > (comparing to arm_pm_idle-based approach) its long. Would something like > this be accepted ever? > > Note that contrary to proc-v7, there's no __v7m_proc macro, I had to define > it in order to avoid another code duplication: And I don't like it - until we have word from Uwe, I'd like to keep this simple and restricted just to the affected SoC. Until we have it proven that this is a generic problem, we shouldn't go treating it as such. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
