On 19-06-15, 11:44, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 06/18, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > The problem you stated now was there with the current state of > > bindings. The name is embedded into the OPP table node and so is fixed > > for all the CPUs. Moving it to the CPU node will give all CPUs a > > chance to name it whatever they want to. And the same list has to be > > replicated to all CPUs sharing the clock rails. > > > > Yes I don't see how the name will be different for any CPU, hence > my complaint/question about duplicate names in each CPU. I guess > it isn't any worse than clock-names though so I'm fine with it. So what I wrote about the string being same for all CPUs, is valid only to CPUs sharing clock line and hence OPPs. If there are CPUs with independent lines, like in Krait, then the CPUs are free to choose whatever name they want for the OPP tables, even if they are sharing the same tables. -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
