On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Charles Keepax
<ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 05:39:22PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Charles Keepax
>> <ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:36:47AM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> >> Hi Charles,
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Charles Keepax
>> >> <ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> > Convert to using the newer gpiod interface for the micd_pol_gpio.
>> >> > Although we still carry support for the old gpio interface from pdata.
>> >> >
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> > ---
>> >> > + mode = GPIOD_OUT_HIGH;
>> >> > + else
>> >> > + mode = GPIOD_OUT_LOW;
>> >> > +
>> >> > + info->micd_pol_gpio = gpiod_get_optional(arizona->dev,
>> >> > + "wlf,micd-pol",
>> >> > + GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
>> >>
>> >> You can use the devm_gpiod_get_optional() to manage the system
>> >> resource automatically.
>> >>
>> >
>> > We can't actually use the devm call here, we need to pass
>> > arizona->dev as that is where the DT will reside, which is the
>> > device for the MFD. But if the devm is attached to the device for
>> > the MFD then it will not clear up when the extcon driver is
>> > unloaded. As such we have to do the put manually.
>> >
>> > I will look at respinning for the other comments.
>>
>> I don't understand. extcon-arizona.c used already following devm_* functions:
>> - devm_kzalloc()
>> - devm_regulator_get()
>> - devm_extcon_dev_*()
>> - devm_input_allocate_device()
>> - devm_gpio_request_one()
>
> Yes but if you look at those all of those are against &pdev->dev
> which is the extcon device.
>
> The gpiod interface expects the device passed to both contain
> the of_node and be used for the devm operations. But we need to
> use the extcon device for the devm operations, but the of_node is
> contained on the MFD device.
>
> So if I do:
>
> devm_gpiod_get_optional(arizona->dev, ....
>
> Then the gpiod won't be released when the extcon device is
> removed. But if I do:
>
> devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, ....
>
> Then it won't be able to find the DT entries.
I understand the difference between arizona->dev and &pdev->dev.
But, extcon-arizona.c already get the instance of regulator by using
devm_regulator_get() with &pdev->dev as following:
The devm_regulator_get() can find the DT entry in dts file.
info->micvdd = devm_regulator_get(&pdev-dev, "MICVDD");
How did extcon-arizona.c get the instance of regulator throught
devm_regulator_get() in dts file?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
