On 19 June 2015 at 00:45, Michael Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Quoting Joachim Eastwood (2015-06-10 07:02:59) >> Hi Mike, >> >> >> > Hi Joachim, >> > >> > If it were me, I would have broken this up into two tables, one for each >> > CCU. In general I would structure the code to reflect the fact that two >> > different IP blocks are being accessed. This isn't a deal breaker but I >> > thought I would mention it in case you want to make the change. >> > >> > Otherwise this series looks good to me. Let me know if you plan a V5 >> > submission. >> >> If there is still time for 4.2 and you don't have any more comments on >> how the driver uses the DT bindings I would rather send a follow up >> patch that splits the ccu table for 4.3. >> >> >> > I can take patches #1-4 into the clk tree. Please add my Acked-by to >> > patch #5. I will create an immutable branch to share with the arm-soc >> > tree so that they can take #5 and have access to the dt-bindings >> > headers. >> >> Sounds good. I'll talk to arm-soc team about it. But it isn't critical >> for me to get the DTS changes in for 4.2, but I would be very grateful >> for getting the drivers and headers in for 4.2 so that 4.3 is ready >> and doesn't have any header dependencies for all the driver DTS stuff. > > Patches #1-4 applied to clk-next for 4.2. Thanks a lot, Mike. regards, Joachim Eastwood -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
