On Tuesday, June 16, 2015 02:23:23 PM Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 16-06-15, 06:01, Viresh Kumar wrote: > >> On 16 June 2015 at 05:05, Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> +- opp-suspend: Phandle of the OPP to set while device is suspended. > >> >> + > >> > > >> > I would just do a bool property in the OPP you want. > >> > >> I will do that if you want, no big deal. > > > > In order to not waste any time, here is the change you suggested. Ack > > the one (original change or this one) you like :) > > > > ------------------8<---------------------- > > > > From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 08:27:49 +0530 > > Subject: [PATCH V8] OPP: Add binding for 'opp-suspend' > > > > On few platforms, for power efficiency, we want the device to be > > configured for a specific OPP while we put the device in suspend state. > > > > Add an optional property in operating-points-v2 bindings for that. > > > > Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> > > Suggested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > V7->V8: > > - opp-suspend is moved to OPPs instead of the table, and is bool now. > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks! Does your ACK also apply to patches [1-2/3] in this series? Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
